Balancing Power in Intellectual Property: The Role of Public Authorities and Public Policy Restrictions
In the modern business environment, intellectual property (IP) is more than a legal right—it is a cornerstone of competitive advantage. Yet, while IP laws grant strong protections, they also carry risks: powerful companies could misuse these rights to crush competitors, and counterfeiters could erode the value of genuine innovations. This is why the law brings both public bodies and public policy restrictions into play, ensuring that the system remains fair, balanced, and workable for businesses of all sizes.
1. Why Public Authorities Step In
Counterfeiting is not a small problem. Today’s global trade still suffers billions in losses due to fake goods, whether they are designer clothes, pharmaceuticals, software, or luxury electronics. Because this harms not only creators but also consumers and national economies, governments actively intervene.
-
Criminal Liability: In many jurisdictions, large-scale counterfeiting is treated as a criminal offense. For example, distributing pirated software or selling fake branded medicine can lead to prosecution, fines, and even imprisonment.
-
Border Measures: Customs authorities in the UK, US, EU, and many Asian countries allow IP owners to file notices so that counterfeit goods can be intercepted before they enter the market. Imagine a small skincare brand in Europe: by registering its trade mark with customs, it can prevent a shipment of fake creams from China from ever reaching the shelves.
-
Consumer Safety: Public agencies step in especially when counterfeits threaten health and safety. Fake car parts, counterfeit vaccines, or substandard electronics are not only unfair competition—they put lives at risk.
In short, public bodies act as a protective shield, ensuring that IP rights are not just private tools but part of a broader public interest.
2. When IP Owners Push Too Far
At the same time, governments recognize that IP rights are monopolies. A patent, a trade mark, or a design grants exclusive control—but unchecked exclusivity could allow large corporations to abuse smaller businesses.
Consider this: a multinational could send intimidating letters to small retailers, threatening to sue them for selling a product that allegedly infringes a patent. Even if the patent is weak or invalid, the mere cost of defending a lawsuit might scare the retailer into surrendering.
To prevent such abuses, legal systems impose public policy restrictions:
-
Unjustified Threats: In the UK and similar systems, if an IP owner threatens a competitor or a retailer without solid grounds, the target can turn the tables. They can sue the IP owner for making an unjustified threat. This shifts the balance, ensuring that threats are used responsibly.
-
Permitted Actions: The law still allows IP owners to act directly against manufacturers or importers who produce or bring infringing goods into the country. But restrictions apply further down the supply chain to protect smaller players like shop owners and distributors.
-
Competition Law: In some cases, competition authorities can step in if IP rights are used to block fair market access. For example, if a tech company refuses to license a critical patent needed for industry-wide safety standards, regulators might impose a compulsory license.
3. Lessons for Business Owners
For entrepreneurs and business owners, these rules are not just legal theory—they have direct, practical value.
-
If you are a victim of counterfeits: Remember that you can call upon customs and public prosecutors, not just private lawyers. Registering your rights with border authorities could save you huge losses.
-
If you are enforcing your IP: Be careful with aggressive letters or warnings. Before sending out a legal threat, confirm that your rights are valid and that real infringement has occurred. Otherwise, you may face a counterclaim that flips the case against you.
-
If you are a retailer or distributor: Know your protection. If a large brand threatens to sue you unfairly, you may have legal remedies. Do not assume that the bigger player always has the stronger hand.
Intellectual property law is not only about rewarding innovation—it is also about balancing power. On one side, public bodies protect creators and consumers from counterfeiters. On the other, public policy restrictions prevent IP owners from abusing their monopolies.
For business owners, the message is clear: IP is a powerful asset, but its use comes with responsibilities. Knowing when to lean on public authorities and when to tread carefully with enforcement can mean the difference between building a sustainable brand and stumbling into costly legal battles.
Q1: Why do public authorities intervene in cases of counterfeiting?
To protect consumers, economies, and genuine businesses from harm.
Because it only benefits big corporations.
To reduce the number of patents in circulation.
Q2: What is an “unjustified threat” in intellectual property law?
When an IP owner threatens legal action without solid legal grounds.
When a business warns competitors after winning a lawsuit.
When customs seize counterfeit goods at the border.
Q3: What should small retailers know if threatened unfairly by a big brand?
They may have legal remedies and can challenge unjustified threats.
They have no choice but to stop selling the product.
They must pay a licensing fee immediately.
