Beyond the Courtroom: Post-Trial Remedies Every Business Must Understand
When people think of intellectual property (IP) disputes, they often imagine the drama of a courtroom battle: lawyers debating, judges deciding, and verdicts being read aloud. But for anyone running a business—whether a startup in Asia, a design house in Europe, or a tech company in the United States—the real impact often comes after the trial. Winning the case is only the beginning. The next step is to ensure that the judgment actually protects your business in the marketplace. That is where post-trial remedies come into play.
These remedies are not abstract legal concepts. They are practical tools that can determine whether your brand survives and grows—or whether infringers continue to profit from your hard work. Let’s break them down.
1. Final Injunctions – The Shield That Stops Future Harm
Most intellectual property laws around the world give courts the power to issue a final injunction once infringement has been proven. This is essentially a legal command: the infringer must stop producing, selling, or distributing the infringing products.
-
How it works: A company that copied your patented software feature is ordered to remove it from their product line.
-
Why it matters for business: Without an injunction, the infringer could simply pay damages and continue competing with you unfairly. An injunction prevents this “business-as-usual” approach and gives you room to breathe.
-
Flexibility: Courts today recognize that injunctions are discretionary. They may limit or delay them if public interest is at stake—for instance, if the product is life-saving medical equipment and no immediate alternative exists. But generally, courts lean toward protecting IP owners, because strong enforcement supports innovation and fair competition.
For entrepreneurs, this means that winning an injunction can be more valuable than winning damages. It ensures your business has the exclusive control over the market space your IP protects.
2. Monetary Remedies – Turning Loss into Compensation
Once infringement is established, money becomes a central question. Two main approaches exist:
a) Damages
Damages aim to restore you to the financial position you would have been in if no infringement occurred.
-
If you sell products yourself, you may recover lost profits—the sales you would have made if customers had not been diverted.
-
If you do not sell products directly (for example, if you license your IP), you may instead receive a reasonable licensing fee. This is what the infringer should have paid if they had approached you legally.
Example: Imagine a fashion startup in Milan whose unique handbag design was copied by a rival. If the rival stole market share, the startup could claim lost profits. If the startup was licensing its design to third-party manufacturers, then damages would be calculated as unpaid licensing fees.
b) Account of Profits
Instead of damages, a claimant may elect for an account of profits. This is an equitable remedy: the court orders the infringer to hand over the profits earned from the unlawful use of the IP.
-
Why choose this? Sometimes, damages may be hard to prove. If the infringer earned massive profits, but your business is still small and unable to show major losses, an account of profits ensures you benefit from the value they unfairly extracted.
-
Limitation: You cannot claim both damages and an account of profits. You must choose one, usually after trial when the numbers are clearer.
This choice matters for entrepreneurs. A new e-commerce brand in Singapore, for example, might not have evidence of large lost sales but could still strip away the profits made by counterfeiters selling knock-offs online.
3. Additional Damages – Punishing Flagrant Infringement
In some jurisdictions, courts may award additional damages where the infringement was deliberate, blatant, or carried out with disregard for the law.
For instance, if a nightclub in New York knowingly plays unlicensed music despite repeated warnings, or an online seller in Berlin keeps relisting counterfeit sneakers under new profiles, a judge may impose enhanced damages to reflect the “flagrancy” of the infringement.
For businesses, this is crucial: it sends a clear signal that infringers cannot treat litigation as just a cost of doing business. If your competitor continues to ignore IP rights, the court can impose a financial penalty heavy enough to deter future misconduct.
4. Ancillary Remedies – Beyond Money and Injunctions
Sometimes, stopping infringement and receiving compensation is not enough. You may also need to clean up the market to protect your reputation and prevent ongoing confusion. Legislators in many countries have created tools for this:
-
Erasure of infringing signs: Courts can order counterfeit logos, labels, or trademarks to be removed from products, packaging, or advertising.
-
Delivery up and destruction: Judges can order that counterfeit items—fake electronics, pirated books, copied furniture—be handed over and destroyed, ensuring they do not re-enter circulation.
-
Seizure rights: In some cases, copyright holders can seize counterfeit items directly, especially in street markets or pop-up stalls.
Example: A small cosmetics company in Seoul that discovers counterfeit beauty products using its brand name could secure an order requiring the destruction of all seized counterfeit stock. This not only protects consumers from potentially dangerous fakes but also restores the brand’s credibility.
5. Innocent Infringement – When the Infringer Didn’t Know
Courts also recognize that not all infringers are malicious. Sometimes, a retailer unknowingly stocks counterfeit goods from a supplier. In such cases, statutes may reduce or eliminate damages if the infringer can prove they were genuinely unaware of the IP rights.
For entrepreneurs, this is a double-edged sword:
-
If you are the IP owner, you must prove that even “innocent” infringements caused harm.
-
If you are expanding into new markets, you must also ensure your supply chains are clear. Selling counterfeit goods—even unknowingly—can lead to orders for destruction of your stock and reputational harm.
why This Matters for Businesses Today
At the end of a trial, the remedies available are not just about punishment—they are about shaping the competitive environment of your business.
-
Startups gain breathing space with injunctions.
-
Established brands recover profits and deter freeloaders.
-
Global companies rely on destruction and delivery-up orders to maintain consumer trust.
-
Small retailers must be vigilant, because even innocent possession of counterfeit stock can trigger consequences.
In the fast-moving world of global trade, knowing these remedies is not optional. They are the levers that turn a court judgment into a real-world business advantage.
In short: winning in court is not enough. You must understand and actively use post-trial remedies—injunctions, damages, accounts of profits, and ancillary measures—to fully protect your brand, your innovations, and your future growth.
Q1: What is the main purpose of a final injunction in post-trial remedies?
To stop ongoing or future infringement after a trial.
To automatically compensate the claimant with money.
To punish infringers with criminal penalties.
To allow competitors to continue selling while paying fees.
Q2: What is an “account of profits” in post-trial remedies?
Forcing the infringer to hand over profits earned from the infringement.
Awarding damages for emotional distress.
Paying a fixed statutory fine set by the court.
A refund of legal expenses to the claimant’s lawyer.
Q3: What can courts order as ancillary remedies in IP cases?
Destruction or delivery-up of counterfeit goods.
Automatic renewal of the claimant’s IP rights.
Free advertising space for the claimant’s brand.
Automatic compensation for unrelated business losses.
